Blog about Underwater Life and Scuba Diving

Kinds of questions used during meeting for collecting information. Component 2

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Kinds of questions used during meeting for collecting information. Component 2

In the previous article, we now have already talked concerning the function and kinds of topic and management questions. Now, let’s go to the remainder of questions category.

Function of behavioral forms of concerns

Behavioral questions in change serve to govern the interlocutor, provoking particular actions on his component. Such concerns are used in interview-confrontation. The journalist’s objective in this full case just isn’t getting the information, but to make the interviewee away from himself, so that you can present it towards the visitors as unbalanced, dishonest and stupid. It must be borne at heart that after making use of such concerns a journalist will not only spoil relations because of the character for the interview, however the easiest way to check in the eyes of readers when they get the journalist’s tricks dishonest. Behavioral concerns are split into:

  • suggestive,
  • questions-traps,
  • hinting,
  • amplifying,
  • provoking.

The question that is suggestive one answer better than others, as an example: “All honest individuals repeat this. And would you? “Or:” Do not you imagine that anybody who votes against our prospect will not want a development that is stable of country?” The interlocutor is offered either to agree with some declaration which he will not think is right, or even to declare himself dishonest or otherwise not as with any other individuals.

The trap real question is a concern through the category: “Have you already stopped consuming?” – any response to that will never be and only the interlocutor, that he is either drinking now or was drinking earlier since he must admit. Inspite of the well known of the trick, journalists continue to actively put it to use.

Hinting, amplifying and provoking questions

With a hinting question, the actual reason for the real question is in the beginning hidden. The interlocutor is inquired about a particular well-known reality, after which, beginning with this fact, they ask a concern that sets the interlocutor in an unfavorable light. Listed here is a fragment regarding the dialogue: “Have you heard about the greenhouse effect?” – “Yes.” – “Do you know its main reason?” – “Yes, the exhaust gases of automobiles.” – ” And just how would you then conscience enables you to drive a motor vehicle?”

The reinforcement question repeats the interlocutor’s statements in an even more rigid, categorical form. The objective of such a question is always to force the interlocutor to refute the aforesaid and thus provide him as somebody who doesn’t have a firm opinion. In the event that interlocutor states which he would not state anything, the journalist can provide another, currently correct estimate utilizing the words: “and you also would not state that either?”

Nevertheless the strongest method to obtain the interlocutor away from himself would be to provoke a question in regards to the reasons for the interlocutor’s mental state, as an example: “Why are you so nervous?”; “Why are you so mad?” An explosion of emotion may follow after such a question. It will be possible that the interview will end there plus the journalist should be thrown out the door. However the journalist shall achieve their goal – to provoke a scandal.

More from this category

More from this author

rss Subscribe to this author

Blog Roll